VICFA - Action Alert

Print the article

This entry was posted on 3/4/2006 5:21 PM and is filed under Market Rules.

IMMEDIATE ACTION NEEDED, VENDORS GIVEN ULTIMATUM

 

The Charlottesville Farmers' Market has told its produce vendors they must be "certified" by a County Extension Agent to sell at the market.  This translates to vendors having to submit to an unwarranted search of their property by a government agent, in this case, one who is not a legally mandated inspection, certification,  nor  enforcement agent. Aside from unwarranted searches being unconstitutional, they are intimidating and oppressive and will drive away longtime vendors.  John Coles, who has been selling his garden produce at the City Market for more than 20 years, was told by Stephanie Anderegg-Maloy, Market Manager, that he will not be allowed to sell at the market unless he submits to the inspection, which he refuses to do on principle.



Mike Svetz, Director of Parks and Recreation (that oversees the market) says this new policy is in response to complaints that certain vendors are "re-selling" (buying produce to re-sell at the market, rather than selling what they grow or produce themselves).  Svetz insists the credibility of the market is at stake, yet also states that market revenues have doubled in the past few years, from $400,000 to $800,000 per year, hardly a sign that customers doubt the vendors.  



This "policy" has been enforced at two of Virginia's oldest markets, Warrenton and Roanoke, and the Warrenton market, at least, has dwindled to a shadow of its once robust self as VDACS-inspired inspections and regulations have taken hold and choked the life out of it.



Charlottesville Market rules and regulations already require that vendors sell only their own produce, and violation is a class 3 misdemeanor.   Yet rather than the Market Manager investigating complaints on an individual basis, which she has the ability and authority to do, she and Svetz have decided everyone is guilty until proven innocent and chose instead this dragnet approach that will relieve them of the burden of investigating and enforcing individual violations.



The future of the Charlottesville market, farmers' markets across the state, and our Fourth Amendment rights are at stake.  Please contact the persons below and tell them to rescind this oppressive policy at once.  The five City Council members (that includes the Mayor and Vice Mayor) oversee and advise Parks and Rec. and the Market.

 

 

Name

Position

Email

Phone: office

Phone: home

Mike Svetz

Director, Parks and Rec

svetz@charlottesville.org

434.970.3260

 

Stephanie Anderegg-Maloy

City Market Manager

maloy@charlottesville.org

434.970.3371

 

David E. Brown

Mayor

dbrown@gmail.com

434.970.3113

434.971.3537

Kevin Lynch

Vice-mayor

klynch@cstone.net

434.293.2890

434.293.2890

Blake Caravati

City Councilor

caravati@cstone.net

434.295.7832

434.296.9636

Kendra Hamilton

City Councilor

Kendra@charlottesville.org

434.245.0241

434.245.0241

Rob Schilling

City Councilor

schilling@charlottesville.org

434.970.3113

434.293.1186

 

For more information please contact John Coles or Christine Solem at 434.973.6505

 






 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments

    • 3/15/2006 4:24 PM N. wrote:
      Most government "inspections" are not per se illegal; think of road blocks and airport security searches. Further, a government search *with the consent* of the party being searched is perfectly legal. If the farmer refuses consent, and the government agent goes away, then nothing illegal occurred. Thus, the only way this new policy could lead to illegal searches, then, is if the government agent trespassed upon the farmer's land and searched despite the farmer's lack of consent. I highly doubt that would occur . . . unless I'm missing some secret motivation to search farm land here.

      I understand the angst in the original message, because I agree that a person's signature ought to be good enough at the outset. But I think it goes too far to declare that the new policy is illegal per se. It simply is not.

      The farmers who choose to sell at the market will do so knowing that this inspection is a prerequisite. If the farm is legit -- what's the problem?
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.